AI & MACHINE LEARNING
BESPOKE DATA VISUALISATIONS
CUSTOM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
CLOUD & OPERATIONS
DATA & ANALYTICS
EMBEDDED & ENGINEERING
IOT & CLOUD
Many mesh networks promise seamless coverage and self-healing capabilities, yet they remain notoriously difficult to troubleshoot. Network engineers must often handle unpredictable performance, backhaul congestion, and interference issues, which make stability a challenge.
EasyMesh was set out to fix some of the biggest issues with traditional mesh networks, like interoperability, vendor lock-in, and multi-node network optimisation. And while the standard lives up to this promise, it’s not to say that it doesn’t have its own deployment challenges. In this article, we’ll look at the most common issues you can come across during EasyMesh implementation. We’ll also mention the potential trade-offs involved in using the standard, and our recommended method of troubleshooting most common EasyMesh issues.
WiFi Alliance refers to its EasyMesh standard as a way for “quality WiFi without complication”. When deployed correctly, it promises the following:
EasyMesh is compatible with embedded systems and devices from multiple manufacturers, including ASUS, Xiaomi, Cudy, Tenda, Linksys, and TP-Link. On the one hand, this solves the biggest question early EasyMesh adopters had. Namely, whether major vendors would allow or restrict EasyMesh to protect their own, proprietary solutions.
On the other, the number of compatible hardware types doesn’t always translate into their interoperability.
Users report that devices from different manufacturers don’t always work seamlessly together. They also note that firmware updates across different devices can be inconsistent, potentially leading to problems with compatibility and wireless network stability.
We discuss these and other common EasyMesh troubleshooting problems below.
Firmware bugs or glitches in a node can lead to malfunctions or unexpected disconnections from the mesh network.
For instance, one user identified an issue within the manageConnections() function in the easyMeshConnection.cpp file. Even after removing the time synchronisation code and keeping only the connection and node synchronisation logic, they continued to experience unexplained Wi-Fi disconnections, despite setting the timeout to 10 seconds. They attempted modifications to address clock resets and were still testing whether these changes would resolve the issue.
Incorrect settings or misconfigurations during setup can prevent nodes from joining or maintaining connections within the mesh network.
Let’s take EasyMesh issues when using TP-Link. Two common scenarios occur:
Scenario 1: Satellite devices aren’t detected or can’t be added to the main router
This can happen in either of the three situations:
Additionally, problems can arise if the satellite device isn’t reset or set to satellite mode correctly. A weak Wi-Fi connection between the devices, or incorrect methods for adding the satellite, can also cause difficulties.
Scenario 2: Ethernet backhaul isn’t working
Another common scenario occurs when the Ethernet backhaul connection isn’t established, despite an Ethernet cable being connected. If the devices are supposed to support Ethernet backhaul by default, then the issue could be that the firmware is outdated.
ISPs also recommend checking for faulty Ethernet cables, using a switch between the devices, and checking if incorrect ports aren’t preventing the connection from working properly.
Excessive data traffic or an overloaded main router can lead to connectivity issues, causing nodes to drop out or become unresponsive.
For example, one user reported issues with their multi-router EasyMesh setup in a three-story building. They switched to two Archer C6 V4 routers for the first and ground floors, using one as the main router and the other as a satellite.
However, they experienced Wi-Fi disconnects on various smartphones, with one specific phone (Samsung S24 Ultra) showing a “sign into network” error. They suspected the main router might have gotten overloaded and tried connecting it via LAN and WAN ports. Yet, this caused the routers to stop working together.
Issues like these introduce confusion around debugging EasyMesh – the correct topology, configuration, and potential overloading of the main router.
Using devices with incompatible firmware versions or from different manufacturers can result in nodes failing to integrate properly into the mesh network. Here’s a real-life example from a user who had been using an AX53 router with their ISP’s ZTE router in bridge mode without issues. After switching to a TP-Link X220 XPON router with EasyMesh, problems began.
The AX53, set as a satellite router, kept resetting. While the X220 detected it in EasyMesh, the network wouldn’t establish.
In Aginet, both routers appeared in a single network, but the AX53 broadcasted the default TP-Link SSID instead of the main router’s. The user couldn’t access its web UI to change it, and any SSID change before setup caused a reset.
Running two routers with double NAT caused speed issues, and some TP-Link Wi-Fi cameras were having trouble staying connected. As a temporary solution, the user set the AX53 in AP mode. Yet, in such a mode, it lacked features like QoS and device-specific data usage tracking.
While we’ve mentioned that more hardware is now compatible with EasyMesh, it’s worth acknowledging that mesh software isn’t naturally compatible with the software in devices like phones or laptops. For some, this is a fundamental problem with mesh network architectures.
Wi-Fi mesh networks depend on devices switching between nodes as needed, but many devices don’t automatically switch to a stronger signal unless they completely lose connection to the current node. This leads to interruptions in service and an overall lack of seamless connectivity.
As one mesh network user noticed, “there’s no reason a proprietary message from the mesh telling a device to switch nodes would be accepted by default. Nor is there a standard way for a device to detect when it needs to switch nodes.”
It’s also worth noting that mesh networks require efficient management of bandwidth and network load. This can be challenging if devices aren’t fully compatible with the network’s traffic priority settings and node switching rules. As a result, poor load balancing can lead to congestion and slow speeds.
The short answer is – to a certain extent.
One the one hand, EasyMesh comes with self-healing mechanisms. These are designed to automatically detect and resolve connectivity issues within the mesh network and help maintain a stable and seamless connection. Even if one or more nodes (routers) experience problems.
The main self-healing functions include:
However, they won’t be able to handle all scenarios fully.
Let’s take the overloaded main router issue mentioned in the previous section.
Self-healing can help redistribute traffic across other routers. However, if the main router is not properly configured or is overloaded (e.g., due to incorrect topology or excessive devices), self-healing may fail to stabilise the network.
The same can be said about Wi-Fi disconnects and “sign into network” errors. If a satellite node is experiencing issues, self-healing mechanisms could reroute traffic to maintain connectivity. That said, if the main router is overloaded or misconfigured, self-healing may not work.
This would call for more advanced troubleshooting, adjusted to the individual ISP and mesh networks setup.
Here are some questions to ask yourself while diagnosing source of EasyMesh network issues:
Also, to prevent issues in the future, we recommend using an open-source system from IOPSYS. It’s built to overcome common EasyMesh challenges and help you build a more reliable, high-performance network.
IOPSYS’s open-source operating system, which we’ve proudly helped develop at Holisticon, effectively tackles the most common issues with EasyMesh integration.
The system lets network operators and telecom providers use EasyMesh to easily integrate chipsets from brands like Broadcom, MediaTek, Qualcomm, and Airoha. All without expensive system redesigns. This gives operators the flexibility to choose the best hardware for their needs while ensuring long-term adaptability.
EasyMesh’s self-optimizing, scalable network ensures smoother Wi-Fi coverage across buildings, improving overall performance. This offers a better experience, without adding complexity for users.
Learn more about the IOPSYS open-source OS for IoT getaways, and how it could help solve your common EasyMesh challenges.
EasyMesh holds great potential to simplify mesh network deployments and improve Wi-Fi performance across multi-node environments. However, as with any standard, its success depends on proper implementation, careful hardware selection, and ongoing optimisation. Compatibility issues, misconfigurations, and vendor-specific quirks can quickly derail even the most promising setups. That’s why having the right tools, like the IOPSYS open-source OS, and a solid understanding of common pitfalls is essential. By addressing these challenges head-on, ISPs and network engineers can finally unlock the true value of EasyMesh – delivering consistent, seamless, and scalable wireless experiences to end users.
At Holisticon Connect, our core values of Passion and Execution drive us toward a Promising Future. We are a hands-on tech company that places people at the centre of everything we do. Specializing in Custom Software Development, Cloud and Operations, Bespoke Data Visualisations, Engineering & Embedded services, we build trust through our promise to deliver and a no-drama approach. We are committed to delivering reliable and effective solutions, ensuring our clients can count on us to meet their needs with integrity and excellence.
Let’s talk about your project needs. Send us a message and will get back to you as soon as possible.