AI & MACHINE LEARNING
BESPOKE DATA VISUALISATIONS
CUSTOM SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
CLOUD & OPERATIONS
DATA & ANALYTICS
EMBEDDED & ENGINEERING
IOT & CLOUD
Software development for the life sciences needs a different approach than traditional projects. 21 CFR Part 11, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance aren’t just items to check off – they’re the foundations that can make or break the whole ordeal. The task gets trickier when you think about collaboration between scientists and developers. Project management needs special skills to plan, schedule, and manage risks. Poor communication can get pricey and create regulatory problems. Life sciences software development must balance technical expertise with industry requirements. This balance only works through cooperative teamwork.
Scientists and developers working together are the lifeblood of state-of-the-art advances in life sciences. Research shows life sciences work naturally tends toward chaos. Scientists typically work in small, isolated groups and collaborate loosely with others. Their isolation creates major challenges when developing software solutions for complex biological problems.
“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.”
Scientists and developers think in completely different ways. Scientists focus on finding new things, while developers prioritize system viability and user acceptance. This disconnect results in software that serves publication purposes but fails to remain usable long-term. Developers in life sciences often must become experts across multiple domains—from software engineering to scientific computing.
Scientific breakthroughs often generate vast amounts of complex data, and turning these insights into actionable tools, therapies, or diagnostics requires robust, scalable, and user-friendly software solutions. Conversely, software development in this domain demands a deep understanding of the underlying scientific principles and data structures to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Scientists strive for rigorous validation and novel discoveries, while developers aim for efficient and reliable software. When these two perspectives converge, it often results in innovative solutions that are both scientifically sound and technologically robust.
For scientific teams, encompassing researchers, biologists, and chemists, their primary aim is inherently validation-focused and research-driven. They embark on iterative experiments, not necessarily to produce a finished product, but to rigorously explore hypotheses, validate their findings, and ultimately generate new knowledge.
In contrast, development teams, composed of developers and engineers, are fundamentally goal-oriented and product-driven. Their core objective is to deliver tangible outputs, whether these are specific software features, complete applications, or robust platforms. While they appreciate the scientific insights their software might enable, their direct focus remains on the engineering aspects of creating a high-quality, deployable software solution.
Software development for life sciences needs both scientists and developers. Neither group has all the answers alone. Organizations that make communication easier between these groups unlock their teams’ full potential and speed up scientific breakthroughs.
Communication is key to success for interdisciplinary teams in life sciences software development. Scientific and technical experts who work together must overcome major communication barriers to reach their shared goals. Teams now work in a changing environment that sees more frequent updates than in the last few years. Large teams spread across different locations face extra challenges, especially when you have members from different fields who don’t share a “common language.”
These practical communication strategies work well to close these gaps:
Regular team meetings boost transparency and build trust. Teams spread across locations should decide how to stay in touch early. This helps members tackle action items between meetings. Some teams succeed by splitting time between different research areas (software development, data management, evaluation). They hold specific meetings for each topic and gather monthly to share progress.
Research still mostly follows the isolated software engineer model, where developers act as both engineers and scientists. This creates language gaps since scientific and technical vocabularies don’t match naturally. A shared glossary of key terms helps bridge this basic communication gap.
Feedback sessions help build team culture and improve how teams work. Short feedback loops through demos, code changes, or continuous delivery save time on wasted efforts. This becomes crucial for success in agile environments because teams learn and adjust quickly.
Visual documentation bridges language gaps between scientific and technical teams. Teams can use diagrams, flowcharts, and other visual tools to transform implicit domain expert knowledge into clear concepts. This approach creates clarity where text-heavy documentation might confuse readers.
Created for software projects, it allows quick response, planning, and execution. Two fundamental properties characterize agile methodology in life sciences: stability and dynamism. Development teams benefit from this approach when requirements evolve over time.
Life sciences and software development teams can break down field barriers and speed up innovation together by using these practical communication strategies.
At Holisticon Connect, our development teams are at the forefront of speeding up scientific breakthroughs in life sciences. We are building custom software that tackles tough problems in areas like genomics and drug discovery. Think of us as the technological experts who are assisting scientists in unlocking new opportunities and making remarkable progress in the field of life sciences.
For this project that explored genomics signals, the developers worked closely with the researchers to fully grasp the complex details of the genomics data and the important need to analyse it quickly:
The case study on the genomics data analysis platform illustrates the developers’ deep understanding of the scientists’ objective to build platforms that precisely manage and analyse vast, sensitive genomic and clinical data:
In building the ecosystem of drug discovery solutions, developers played a key role in cross-functional teams, working closely with scientific experts. This collaboration was of the utmost importance, particularly in domains such as cheminformatics, where the creation of specialized tools necessitated continuous and precise feedback loops with laboratory scientists:
Great things in business are never done by one person; they’re done by a team of people
Software development teams need more than just good intentions to work together well. Here are some practical tips to connect laboratory work with coding, based on real-world experience.
Create a single source of truth for all project information. Teams can combine data from multiple sources into one place that’s available to everyone. Remote teams can work from the same database. This helps break down information barriers and speeds up decision-making with reliable data.
Establish early engagement practices between research and development teams. Organizations can better direct key outputs and make smarter investments when clinical development teams join the research phase earlier.
Hold joint planning sessions with scientists and developers. Life sciences teams work best when they embrace diversity across disciplines. Regular joint sessions allow both developers and scientists to contribute to planning and problem-solving effectively. These collaborative meetings should include views from different ethnicities, locations, career stages, and professional backgrounds.
Use automation strategically for documentation and processes. Smart tools cut down on manual errors and streamline processes, especially for data entry and reports. Digital systems like laboratory information management and electronic lab notebooks come with accessible workflow editors that cut test-record preparation time.
Adopt flexible planning methodologies that welcome change. Life sciences software should support classic, agile, and hybrid planning methods. The best approach brings engineers directly into research projects.
Define clear roles and responsibilities in cross-functional projects. Everyone knows what they should do and how they add value to the bigger picture. Teams should avoid making software engineers handle multiple expert domains at once.
Life sciences organisations can build productive partnerships that turn scientific discoveries into practical, compliant software solutions with these practices.
Different priorities, terminology gaps, and disconnected workflows pose real challenges. Companies that put structured communication strategies and practical integration techniques in place can overcome these barriers. Cross-functional teams create better solutions and make the best use of resources.
Life sciences’ future depends on more than brilliant scientists or skilled developers working on their own. These teams need to build productive partnerships that turn scientific findings into practical, compliant software. Teams that welcome the strategies we’ve discussed here can bridge these gaps and discover the full potential of scientific progress.
At Holisticon Connect, our core values of Passion and Execution drive us toward a Promising Future. We are a hands-on tech company that places people at the centre of everything we do. Specializing in Custom Software Development, Cloud and Operations, Bespoke Data Visualisations, Engineering & Embedded services, we build trust through our promise to deliver and a no-drama approach. We are committed to delivering reliable and effective solutions, ensuring our clients can count on us to meet their needs with integrity and excellence.