There’s no single number that captures the true cost of making decisions based on wrong data – it varies by company, industry, and context. But one thing most of us can agree on is that the cost is too high to ignore. No business can afford to operate on guesswork or misleading insights.

Behind every confident decision is a high-performing data team. In this article, we look at how modern tools like DBT and Snowflake help data teams deliver trusted, well-documented data, so every decision is grounded in clarity, not assumptions.

The everyday chaos of data work – before modern data team workflows and data build tools

Before the rise of modern data tools like DBT and Snowflake, working in a data team felt like navigating chaos. Every analytics project began with a scavenger hunt – tracking down siloed datasets, tribal knowledge, and forgotten SQL snippets buried in personal folders. There was no central source of truth, just scattered fragments stitched together by hand.

Data lived everywhere but where you needed it – sales in one system, marketing in another, operations hidden behind APIs or spreadsheets. Definitions varied wildly. One team’s “active user” wasn’t another’s. Revenue figures conflicted across reports, trust eroded, and time-to-insight stretched from days to weeks.

Stakeholders asked simple questions but got multiple answers. Data teams spent more time explaining discrepancies than delivering insights – a cycle of inefficiency that left everyone second-guessing the numbers.

Conflicting numbers, broken SQL, unclear ownership – most common data team struggles

I’ve seen firsthand how much time a team can lose trying to reconcile mismatched metrics. When two dashboards start showing different numbers for the same KPI, the immediate reaction for companies is to investigate.

However, the root problem often runs deeper than a simple “discrepancy” between two data sources. 

In the pre-DBT era, the culprit was often a lack of SQL version control, undocumented logic, and no clear ownership over the transformation layer.

No one really owned that middle layer where raw data got turned into clean, usable tables. Was it the responsibility of data engineering? Analytics? Business operations? Because the answer was unclear, accountability was scattered. 

Frequently, much of the SQL logic lived in BI tools or one-off scripts, with no versioning or testing, and little to no data documentation. A simple schema change upstream could quietly break key reports downstream. 

This often led to risky blind spots. Leadership would place too much confidence in polished dashboards with real-time charts and clean visuals. But instead of driving new insights or change, the data simply confirmed existing assumptions. The absence of surprise became a warning sign: the data wasn’t pushing the business forward, just keeping it comfortable.

Ultimately, these kinds of issues aren’t just technical. Fixing them requires more than just better tooling. It means clarifying ownership, building trust, and aligning on what it actually means to be a data-driven company.

Why data chaos isn’t “just” a technical problem

The challenges of data chaos don’t just frustrate technical teams; they have real, lasting consequences for the entire business. Unreliable metrics lead to poor decisions. Duplicate efforts waste time and resources. And ultimately, the business feels the pain.

Some of the most damaging outcomes of this data disorder include:

Business data blindness

This comes in two forms. First, missed opportunities – critical insights about markets, customers, or operations remain hidden simply because the data isn’t accessible or reliable enough to surface them.The second, more insidious, is what Kevin Hanagan calls the “illusion of control.” Organizations might have polished dashboards, filled with real-time metrics, trend lines, and colorful charts lighting up boardroom screens. These visuals create a comforting sense of clarity, suggesting that everything is under control. But as Hanagan points out, that certainty is deceptive. Over time, leaders realize they haven’t seen anything surprising in their data. Worse, the data rarely, if ever, drives transformative decisions. It feels informative, but it doesn’t change the game.

Lack of trust

As data inconsistencies pile up, trust starts to erode. Teams become disillusioned with the quality of insights. When marketing stops trusting the numbers from the data team, they spin up their own systems. Finance does the same. Product follows suit. Before long, the company has five competing “sources of truth,” each telling a slightly different story.

This fragmentation isn’t just inefficient, it’s unsustainable. Instead of aligning around shared insights, departments drift apart, each making decisions based on their own version of reality.

Broader implications

These technical challenges ripple outwards. Inconsistent data doesn’t just frustrate analysts, it erodes confidence at the highest levels of leadership. When stakeholders can’t rely on data, it becomes harder to make strategic, data-driven decisions. Meanwhile, data teams are stuck in a reactive mode, constantly firefighting issues, reconciling reports, and patching systems, leaving little time to deliver real business value.

How modern data teams work

Fast-forward to today: the landscape of data work has matured. While the chaos isn’t entirely gone, it’s now structured, manageable, and increasingly automated. Tools like DBT and Snowflake have transformed how data teams operate, shaping what we now recognize as the modern data team workflow bringing clarity and efficiency to what used to be a tangled mess.

Overview of tools and workflow: extract/load, transform, deliver

Modern data workflows follow a well-defined sequence:

• Extract/Load – tools like Fivetran or Airbyte automate the process of pulling raw data from SaaS apps, databases, and APIs, loading it into centralized cloud warehouses like Snowflake.
  
• Transform – this is where DBT shines. It takes raw data and applies modular, reusable SQL models to clean, join, and structure the data into business-ready formats.
  
• Deliver – the refined data is then exposed through BI tools like Looker, Tableau, or Mode, empowering stakeholders to explore insights via dashboards and reports.
  

This separation of concerns is at the heart of the modern data team workflow allowing each layer of the stack to evolve independently while keeping the entire pipeline easier to manage, audit, and scale.

Take Morse Code Translator, for example. Founder and web developer Burak Özdemir shared how his team implements this modern workflow:

• They use Fivetran to extract and load data into Snowflake.
  
• All transformations happen in DBT, where SQL is managed like code – versioned with Git, scheduled, and tested. Each pull request includes automated tests and documentation, ensuring changes don’t break anything silently.
  
• They maintain separate staging and production environments, using environment-aware configurations to catch logic errors before they reach stakeholders.

“For delivery, we use Looker or Metabase, depending on the team,” said Özdemir. “Our BI dashboards pull directly from the cleaned DBT models, which has cut support tickets in half. This workflow makes changes easier to track, test, and explain across teams.”

This approach not only streamlines processes but also fosters collaboration between data engineers, analysts, and business teams. Automated checks improve efficiency, reduce manual interventions, and – most importantly – help stakeholders trust the insights they rely on.

Code-driven data modeling: version control, testing, documentation

One of DBT’s key innovations is treating data transformations as code. This shift brings software engineering best practices into data work:

• Version control – SQL models are stored in Git, enabling collaborative development, code reviews, and rollback capabilities.
  
• Automated testing – data tests like ensuring no nulls in critical columns or that record counts match expectations are embedded directly in the transformation workflow, catching issues early before they escalate.
  
• Documentation – DBT auto-generates documentation alongside your models, creating a living, searchable knowledge base. With inline comments and descriptions, context is baked into the code, making data pipelines transparent and easier to onboard into.

This approach, often called Analytics Engineering, bridges the gap between traditional data engineering and business analysis. It treats data as a product – versioned, tested, and documented – ensuring reliability and consistency across teams.

A good example of how teams can build such a setup comes from entrepreneur Andrew Lokenauth, who held leadership roles at companies like JPMorgan, Citi, and Goldman Sachs.

“In my current setup, we’re running a smooth operation with Fivetran pulling data from about 15+ sources straight into Snowflake (our data warehouse). As raw data is messy, we use DBT to transform it into a useful format,”Lokenauth explained. 

He told me that what made the biggest difference is breaking down their transformation into stages through a modular DBT-powered approach. “I personally structure it with staging models that clean up the raw data, then intermediate models for business logic, and, finally, smart models that our BI folks can use.”

Version control with git has been an absolute lifesaver for Lockenauth’s team, whenever they have had to roll back changes when something broke.

The company is also serious about testing. “I’ve made it mandatory for my team to run data testing in DBT – basic tasks like making sure ‘order_ids’ are unique, but also more complex business logic tests. Last month, these tests caught a weird edge case where our revenue calculations were off by 3% due to some duplicate transactions.”

Automation and environment-aware transformations

DBT also supports environment-specific configurations, allowing teams to differentiate between development and production settings. This means:

• Developers can experiment with smaller datasets or scoped-down models locally, avoiding unnecessary compute costs.
  
• Changes are tested thoroughly in isolated environments before being promoted to production, reducing the risk of disrupting critical workflows.

Automation ensures these transformations run seamlessly as part of scheduled pipelines, so data remains fresh without manual intervention. If something breaks, it gets flagged before it impacts downstream reports.

Lokenauth’s team, for example, has set up separate dev and prod environments in Snowflake. “We learned that the hard way, after accidentally running heavy transformations in the production environment,” he admitted. Their DBT runs are scheduled through Airflow, with different schedules for different data freshness needs. Marketing dashboards update hourly, while financial reports run nightly.

“In dev, we use DBT’s target variable to limit data processing to just the last 7 days, while prod runs on the full dataset.” This lets the company save on compute costs and accelerate development.

What a day in the life of a data team looks like in practice

It’s 9:00 AM, and the day starts – not with coffee – but with a Slack alert. One of the production data tests has failed. The model ensuring unique order IDs is throwing red flags duplicates where there shouldn’t be any. You dive in, tracing the issue to an upstream schema change that quietly introduced an edge case your tests missed.

By 10:30 AM, you’ve patched the DBT model, rerun the pipeline, and added a sturdier test to catch this in the future. Fire extinguished but the process is stronger for it.

At 11:30 AM, it’s time to shift gears. The growth team wants to improve multi-touch attribution. You walk them through current models, explain what’s possible, and brainstorm new logic together. It’s not just numbers, you’re helping frame better questions.

After lunch, 1:00 PM brings a pull request review. A teammate’s new customer segmentation model looks good, but you suggest improvements: naming conventions for consistency, clearer documentation to explain the logic. Not glamorous, but this is the glue that keeps things scalable.

At 2:30 PM, there’s an anomaly in the revenue dashboard, numbers look off. Using DBT’s lineage tracking, you trace it back to a failed warehouse job. You rerun it, tweak alerts, and restore trust in the data.

By 4:00 PM, you’re planning for a product launch, mapping schema changes and updating the pipeline playbook.

The invisible glue work

Beneath the surface, it’s the naming conventions, dependency management, and lineage tracking that keep the stack reliable. Quiet work but the backbone of data quality, scalability, and a resilient data engineering workflow as the business grows.

Why business teams should care about improving data quality

Better data = better (and faster) decisions

When data is consistently modeled, tested, and documented, it becomes a dependable foundation for decision-making. Questions like tracking active customers or analyzing revenue by cohort – once requiring days of back-and-forth – can now be answered in seconds. Teams explore insights directly, reducing manual requests and guesswork. This level of self-service and speed isn’t just a luxury – it’s powered by reliable, high-performance data pipelines that drive smarter decisions across product, marketing, and operations.

Sometimes, the importance of data quality becomes clearest through cautionary tales. Lokenauth shared one from last March at his company:

“We ran a major promotional campaign using flawed customer segmentation data. Preferences weren’t updated properly, so price-sensitive customers got premium offers, and high-value customers received basic ones.” The result? $50K in marketing spend wasted, over $150K in lost revenue, and unhappy customers.

“The root cause was missing data quality checks. Afterward, we implemented Great Expectations with DBT to catch these issues early,” said Lokenauth.

Reduces fire-fighting and makes analytics self-serve

When data quality improves, everyone wins. In the old world, analysts spent half their time firefighting – double-checking numbers, fixing broken dashboards, and chasing down inconsistencies. Business teams were stuck waiting on reports, unsure if the numbers they had were accurate.

With a modern data stack, much of that manual, reactive work is automated and standardized. Data teams spend less time fixing things and more time building new insights. Business users gain confidence in self-serve dashboards, reducing the constant “Can you pull this report for me?” requests.

The result? Fewer bottlenecks, faster decision-making, and more time for data teams to focus on strategic work, all while empowering business teams to move independently with trusted data at their fingertips.

Builds trust in the numbers and avoids constant rework

At the heart of it all is trust.

When numbers are consistent across reports, when definitions are shared and documented, and when changes are tracked and tested, people start to believe in the data again. That belief transforms data from something that supports decisions into something that drives them.

Modern tools like DBT bring software engineering practices – version control, testing, documentation – into the analytics workflow. This makes it easy for anyone to trace how metrics are defined, see how data flows, and trust that what’s on the dashboard truly reflects the business.

This isn’t just a win for technical teams. Transparency and trust in the data ripple across the entire organization, reducing rework, aligning teams, and ensuring that decisions are grounded in a shared reality.

From clarity to impact – the future of data teams

As data continues to shape how businesses operate, the role of the data team is no longer just about pipelines and dashboards — it’s about building a culture of trust, accountability, and continuous improvement. The shift from chaos to insights isn’t a one-time transformation, but an ongoing commitment to treating data as a product and collaboration as a default. With the right tools, workflows, and mindset in place, high-performing data teams don’t just answer questions — they help organizations ask better ones, move faster, and make smarter decisions with confidence.

Passion And Execution

Who We Are

At Holisticon Connect, our core values of Passion and Execution drive us toward a Promising Future. We are a hands-on tech company that places people at the centre of everything we do. Specializing in Custom Software Development, Cloud and Operations, Bespoke Data Visualisations, Engineering & Embedded services, we build trust through our promise to deliver and a no-drama approach. We are committed to delivering reliable and effective solutions, ensuring our clients can count on us to meet their needs with integrity and excellence.

more about Holisticon Connect